<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (3) TMI 43 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190565</link>
    <description>Dividend received by a shareholder from a tea company did not retain agricultural income character merely because the company&#039;s profits partly included exempt agricultural receipts. A company is a separate legal entity, and the shareholder&#039;s income arises only when dividend is declared; the immediate and effective source of that receipt is the dividend declaration, not the land from which the company&#039;s profits were generated. The exemption for agricultural income applies only where the assessee&#039;s own income is directly derived from land used for agricultural purposes. Accordingly, the dividend was taxable in the shareholder&#039;s hands and was not exempt as agricultural income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:39:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (3) TMI 43 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190565</link>
      <description>Dividend received by a shareholder from a tea company did not retain agricultural income character merely because the company&#039;s profits partly included exempt agricultural receipts. A company is a separate legal entity, and the shareholder&#039;s income arises only when dividend is declared; the immediate and effective source of that receipt is the dividend declaration, not the land from which the company&#039;s profits were generated. The exemption for agricultural income applies only where the assessee&#039;s own income is directly derived from land used for agricultural purposes. Accordingly, the dividend was taxable in the shareholder&#039;s hands and was not exempt as agricultural income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>