https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190548 The Supreme Court held that the Government Order clearly intended to take over only the cadre of Divisional Accountants and not the SAS cadre. The Court found that the State Government's decision to exclude SAS Accountants was a matter of policy within its discretion and not discriminatory. The Court dismissed allegations of discrimination under Article 14 of the Constitution, emphasizing that the decision was based on administrative considerations. The Court set aside the Tribunal's judgment and dismissed the respondents' appeals, affirming the State Government's authority to determine the inclusion of SAS Accountants in the State Service. en-us Thu, 22 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Feb 2017 15:19:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190548 The Supreme Court held that the Government Order clearly intended to take over only the cadre of Divisional Accountants and not the SAS cadre. The Court found that the State Government's decision to exclude SAS Accountants was a matter of policy within its discretion and not discriminatory. The Court dismissed allegations of discrimination under Article 14 of the Constitution, emphasizing that the decision was based on administrative considerations. The Court set aside the Tribunal's judgment and dismissed the respondents' appeals, affirming the State Government's authority to determine the inclusion of SAS Accountants in the State Service. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190548