https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190546 The Supreme Court reiterated that the Administrative Tribunal's review power under Section 22(3)(f) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 is coextensive with Order 47 Rule 1 CPC and cannot be used to reopen a final order after dismissal of the special leave petition against it. Once the original order has attained finality, judicial discipline and finality bar further review. The Court also confined the expression "person aggrieved" to those directly and immediately affected by the order, holding that a remote or speculative possibility of future promotion does not confer standing to seek review. Review petitions by such applicants were therefore unsustainable. en-us Tue, 21 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Feb 2017 15:04:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190546 The Supreme Court reiterated that the Administrative Tribunal's review power under Section 22(3)(f) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 is coextensive with Order 47 Rule 1 CPC and cannot be used to reopen a final order after dismissal of the special leave petition against it. Once the original order has attained finality, judicial discipline and finality bar further review. The Court also confined the expression "person aggrieved" to those directly and immediately affected by the order, holding that a remote or speculative possibility of future promotion does not confer standing to seek review. Review petitions by such applicants were therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190546