<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 1240 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190545</link>
    <description>A statutory corporation was treated as being under the control of the State Government where the enabling law gave the Government pervasive powers of appointment, removal, supervision, direction on service conditions and wages, inspection, and takeover or supersession. The Court stated that this level of control satisfied the meaning of &quot;under the control of the Government&quot; both in Article 12 of the Constitution and in Section 11(1)(c) of the Andhra Pradesh Factories and Establishments (National Festival and other Holidays) Act, 1974. It also noted that the later reliance on Section 68-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 did not negate that control, and the corporation therefore fell outside the holiday-wages exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 14:56:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 1240 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190545</link>
      <description>A statutory corporation was treated as being under the control of the State Government where the enabling law gave the Government pervasive powers of appointment, removal, supervision, direction on service conditions and wages, inspection, and takeover or supersession. The Court stated that this level of control satisfied the meaning of &quot;under the control of the Government&quot; both in Article 12 of the Constitution and in Section 11(1)(c) of the Andhra Pradesh Factories and Establishments (National Festival and other Holidays) Act, 1974. It also noted that the later reliance on Section 68-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 did not negate that control, and the corporation therefore fell outside the holiday-wages exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>