<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 806 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339106</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act was not sustainable as the assessee provided a bona fide explanation for omitting the management bonus from the return, and the Revenue did not suffer any loss due to tax already deducted at source. The penalty of Rs. 6,58,573/- was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 14:50:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 806 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339106</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act was not sustainable as the assessee provided a bona fide explanation for omitting the management bonus from the return, and the Revenue did not suffer any loss due to tax already deducted at source. The penalty of Rs. 6,58,573/- was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>