<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 783 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339083</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals filed by the assessee, confirming the legitimacy and business purpose of the professional fees paid to PASA. The penalties under Section 271(1)(c) were deleted, and the revenue&#039;s cross appeals were dismissed. The judgment emphasized the legality of &#039;success-based&#039; fees for non-professional entities and the importance of substantiating business expenditures with adequate documentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 14:48:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 783 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339083</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals filed by the assessee, confirming the legitimacy and business purpose of the professional fees paid to PASA. The penalties under Section 271(1)(c) were deleted, and the revenue&#039;s cross appeals were dismissed. The judgment emphasized the legality of &#039;success-based&#039; fees for non-professional entities and the importance of substantiating business expenditures with adequate documentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>