<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 775 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339075</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the Operation, Management, and Development Agreement (OMDA) does not constitute a franchise under the Finance Act. The transaction between the petitioners and the Airport Authority of India (AAI) was not deemed a taxable service. As a result, the court quashed AAI&#039;s action of blocking the Escrow account and disposed of the writ petitions accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 775 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339075</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the Operation, Management, and Development Agreement (OMDA) does not constitute a franchise under the Finance Act. The transaction between the petitioners and the Airport Authority of India (AAI) was not deemed a taxable service. As a result, the court quashed AAI&#039;s action of blocking the Escrow account and disposed of the writ petitions accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>