<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 676 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190540</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court applied the precedent in Collector of Central Excise v. Wood Polymers Ltd., noting that counsel for both sides ed the earlier decision as governing the matter. On that basis, the Court treated the case as covered by stare decisis and allowed the appeals in terms of that precedent, without further independent reasoning. No order as to costs was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 14:22:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 676 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190540</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court applied the precedent in Collector of Central Excise v. Wood Polymers Ltd., noting that counsel for both sides ed the earlier decision as governing the matter. On that basis, the Court treated the case as covered by stare decisis and allowed the appeals in terms of that precedent, without further independent reasoning. No order as to costs was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>