<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1610 - Jharkhand High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190537</link>
    <description>The Court directed the CESTAT to consider expediting the hearing due to the petitioner&#039;s inability to conduct business following the attachment of their bank account by the department. The writ petition was disposed of with this observation, granting the petitioner the option to approach the Court if further aggrieved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 12:52:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=459008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1610 - Jharkhand High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190537</link>
      <description>The Court directed the CESTAT to consider expediting the hearing due to the petitioner&#039;s inability to conduct business following the attachment of their bank account by the department. The writ petition was disposed of with this observation, granting the petitioner the option to approach the Court if further aggrieved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>