https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190536 Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure confines second appeal jurisdiction to a substantial question of law, and the High Court could not reopen concurrent factual findings by reappreciating evidence. The lower appellate court had assessed the surrounding circumstances, suspicious features of the alleged agreement, and its genuineness, and had returned findings of fact against the respondent. As no real substantial question of law was identified, the High Court's interference was unjustified and the factual findings could not be disturbed. en-us Mon, 01 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Feb 2017 12:43:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190536 Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure confines second appeal jurisdiction to a substantial question of law, and the High Court could not reopen concurrent factual findings by reappreciating evidence. The lower appellate court had assessed the surrounding circumstances, suspicious features of the alleged agreement, and its genuineness, and had returned findings of fact against the respondent. As no real substantial question of law was identified, the High Court's interference was unjustified and the factual findings could not be disturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190536