<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 767 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339067</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the order by setting aside the demand, interest, and penalties for the period before 07.07.2009 but sustained penalties for the period after that date. The appellant was found eligible for credit on cement before the specified date but not after, as it was deemed ineligible post-amendment excluding cement from inputs. The Tribunal directed quantification of penalties for the post-amendment period and partly allowed the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 12:04:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 767 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339067</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the order by setting aside the demand, interest, and penalties for the period before 07.07.2009 but sustained penalties for the period after that date. The appellant was found eligible for credit on cement before the specified date but not after, as it was deemed ineligible post-amendment excluding cement from inputs. The Tribunal directed quantification of penalties for the post-amendment period and partly allowed the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>