<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 765 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339065</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Impugned order, dismissing the appeal of a manufacturer of electrical wires and cables who availed Cenvat credit on inputs and capital goods. The appellant faced differential duty due to price fluctuations when clearing goods through a depot. The Tribunal ruled that adjusting excess duty paid with short paid duty was impermissible under the law, emphasizing the need to follow refund procedures for excess paid duty. Despite citing Tribunal decisions, the appellant&#039;s case was not aligned with the facts, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 765 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339065</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Impugned order, dismissing the appeal of a manufacturer of electrical wires and cables who availed Cenvat credit on inputs and capital goods. The appellant faced differential duty due to price fluctuations when clearing goods through a depot. The Tribunal ruled that adjusting excess duty paid with short paid duty was impermissible under the law, emphasizing the need to follow refund procedures for excess paid duty. Despite citing Tribunal decisions, the appellant&#039;s case was not aligned with the facts, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>