https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190531 Compliance with Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act was mandatory, because the objection process conferred a valuable quasi-judicial right to be heard before acquisition and the defects in notice, hearing, and consideration of material vitiated the enquiry. Acquisition for a cooperative housing society attracted Part VII safeguards, since a cooperative society fell within the statutory definition of "company"; the conditions in Section 40, Rule 4, and the related government-consent and agreement requirements therefore had to be satisfied. The High Court was also required to grant individualized relief under Article 226 and should not have set aside the Section 6 declaration wholesale where petitioners had different factual positions and equities. en-us Fri, 13 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Feb 2017 11:58:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190531 Compliance with Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act was mandatory, because the objection process conferred a valuable quasi-judicial right to be heard before acquisition and the defects in notice, hearing, and consideration of material vitiated the enquiry. Acquisition for a cooperative housing society attracted Part VII safeguards, since a cooperative society fell within the statutory definition of "company"; the conditions in Section 40, Rule 4, and the related government-consent and agreement requirements therefore had to be satisfied. The High Court was also required to grant individualized relief under Article 226 and should not have set aside the Section 6 declaration wholesale where petitioners had different factual positions and equities. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190531