https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339053 Forfeiture of property under SAFEMA was held unsustainable where the mandatory notice and hearing safeguards were not followed. Section 6(2) requires service of a copy of the notice on the person in whose name the property stands when the property is alleged to be held on behalf of another, and Section 7(1) requires a reasonable opportunity of hearing before forfeiture. Because the property stood in the wife's name and no notice or hearing was given to her, the forfeiture order could not be sustained, and it was set aside in respect of that property. en-us Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Feb 2017 11:40:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339053 Forfeiture of property under SAFEMA was held unsustainable where the mandatory notice and hearing safeguards were not followed. Section 6(2) requires service of a copy of the notice on the person in whose name the property stands when the property is alleged to be held on behalf of another, and Section 7(1) requires a reasonable opportunity of hearing before forfeiture. Because the property stood in the wife's name and no notice or hearing was given to her, the forfeiture order could not be sustained, and it was set aside in respect of that property. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339053