<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 747 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339047</link>
    <description>The court directed the release of intercepted Iron and Steel consignment upon payment of a one-time tax of Rs. 19,800, without prejudicing the petitioner&#039;s rights. The petitioner was granted liberty to challenge the tax imposition and a compounding fee of Rs. 39,600 through legal remedies. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs awarded, and the pending application was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 10:56:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 747 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339047</link>
      <description>The court directed the release of intercepted Iron and Steel consignment upon payment of a one-time tax of Rs. 19,800, without prejudicing the petitioner&#039;s rights. The petitioner was granted liberty to challenge the tax imposition and a compounding fee of Rs. 39,600 through legal remedies. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs awarded, and the pending application was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>