<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1094 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190524</link>
    <description>Pre-pregs cleared in roll form of 50 metres were treated as sheetings rather than sheets, applying the distinction recognised in precedent and the Chapter 39 note differentiating the two. On that basis, classification under sub-heading 3926.90 was upheld and the exemption under the relevant notification followed. The marketability objection was not separately examined once classification was decided. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 10:17:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1094 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190524</link>
      <description>Pre-pregs cleared in roll form of 50 metres were treated as sheetings rather than sheets, applying the distinction recognised in precedent and the Chapter 39 note differentiating the two. On that basis, classification under sub-heading 3926.90 was upheld and the exemption under the relevant notification followed. The marketability objection was not separately examined once classification was decided. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>