<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 745 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339045</link>
    <description>A practising chartered accountant who actively participated in the management of companies and a trust, including signing balance sheets, operating bank accounts, and executing loan documents, was treated as having entered the prohibited professional sphere without prior Institute permission. The material also supported a finding of other misconduct where he was linked to applications for demand drafts, account operations, and withdrawals connected with diversion of funds. The pending criminal trial did not bar disciplinary assessment on the available record. On that basis, the disciplinary reference was answered against the respondent and removal from the Register of Members for two years was imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 745 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339045</link>
      <description>A practising chartered accountant who actively participated in the management of companies and a trust, including signing balance sheets, operating bank accounts, and executing loan documents, was treated as having entered the prohibited professional sphere without prior Institute permission. The material also supported a finding of other misconduct where he was linked to applications for demand drafts, account operations, and withdrawals connected with diversion of funds. The pending criminal trial did not bar disciplinary assessment on the available record. On that basis, the disciplinary reference was answered against the respondent and removal from the Register of Members for two years was imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>