<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 618 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190510</link>
    <description>Executive instructions could not relax or override mandatory Staff Regulations governing promotion. The Court noted that Regulation 10 of the Staff Regulations, 1971 required promotions to be considered by a duly constituted Promotion Board and imposed three years&#039; experience as Assistant Category I for consideration to Category II. Because that eligibility condition formed part of the statutory framework, any direction to dilute it was inconsistent with the Regulations. Promotion claims therefore had to be examined strictly under the governing Staff Regulations, and eligible persons were to be considered only in accordance with those rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 17:01:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 618 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190510</link>
      <description>Executive instructions could not relax or override mandatory Staff Regulations governing promotion. The Court noted that Regulation 10 of the Staff Regulations, 1971 required promotions to be considered by a duly constituted Promotion Board and imposed three years&#039; experience as Assistant Category I for consideration to Category II. Because that eligibility condition formed part of the statutory framework, any direction to dilute it was inconsistent with the Regulations. Promotion claims therefore had to be examined strictly under the governing Staff Regulations, and eligible persons were to be considered only in accordance with those rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>