<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 630 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190509</link>
    <description>A passport authority cannot withhold or detain a passport merely on the basis of police intimation or alleged past association when no action has been taken under the Passports Act, 1967. Adverse action affecting a passport must be supported by statutory power and taken only in the manner authorised by law, with the prescribed procedure followed. On that basis, the withholding of the passport was held unjustified and the petitioner was entitled to return of the passport.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:57:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 630 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190509</link>
      <description>A passport authority cannot withhold or detain a passport merely on the basis of police intimation or alleged past association when no action has been taken under the Passports Act, 1967. Adverse action affecting a passport must be supported by statutory power and taken only in the manner authorised by law, with the prescribed procedure followed. On that basis, the withholding of the passport was held unjustified and the petitioner was entitled to return of the passport.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>