<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 642 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190505</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held not leviable where the return disclosed a loss and the assessment also resulted in NIL income. On those facts, the absence of positive assessed income meant that the penal provision was not attracted, and the amendment to Explanation 4(a) did not change that result on the case facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:06:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 642 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190505</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held not leviable where the return disclosed a loss and the assessment also resulted in NIL income. On those facts, the absence of positive assessed income meant that the penal provision was not attracted, and the amendment to Explanation 4(a) did not change that result on the case facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>