https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190497 The court upheld the legality of the seizure and detention of goods under Panchanama orders, emphasizing the need for due process and timely resolution in the pending adjudication proceedings. It clarified that releasing goods before completion of adjudication would undermine the legal framework governing confiscation and redemption. The court directed the petitioner to submit a reply/explanation within one month, with the final order to be passed promptly thereafter, ensuring compliance with the law and due process in handling the matter. en-us Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:56:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190497 The court upheld the legality of the seizure and detention of goods under Panchanama orders, emphasizing the need for due process and timely resolution in the pending adjudication proceedings. It clarified that releasing goods before completion of adjudication would undermine the legal framework governing confiscation and redemption. The court directed the petitioner to submit a reply/explanation within one month, with the final order to be passed promptly thereafter, ensuring compliance with the law and due process in handling the matter. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190497