<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 736 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339036</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on disallowance of depreciation on the building, upholding that the building was utilized for business purposes. The Tribunal also allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the penalty on repairs and maintenance expenses, determining that the expenses were capital in nature and not subject to penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer were deleted in both instances, in line with the decisions of the CIT(A) and a coordinate bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:43:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 736 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339036</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on disallowance of depreciation on the building, upholding that the building was utilized for business purposes. The Tribunal also allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the penalty on repairs and maintenance expenses, determining that the expenses were capital in nature and not subject to penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer were deleted in both instances, in line with the decisions of the CIT(A) and a coordinate bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>