<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 735 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339035</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act due to lease rentals already paid, following the Special Bench decision. The tribunal emphasized judicial discipline and overturned the AO and CIT(A)&#039;s decisions based on High Court judgments. As the main appeal was decided in favor of the assessee, the Stay Application for the outstanding demand was dismissed as academic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:43:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 735 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339035</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act due to lease rentals already paid, following the Special Bench decision. The tribunal emphasized judicial discipline and overturned the AO and CIT(A)&#039;s decisions based on High Court judgments. As the main appeal was decided in favor of the assessee, the Stay Application for the outstanding demand was dismissed as academic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>