<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1191 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190480</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for irregular Cenvat credit on MS items during the extended period and for MS items during the normal period. Penalties were also revoked due to the appellant&#039;s good faith actions. However, the demand for credit on prefabricated building parts was upheld. The appeal was partially allowed, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 07:00:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1191 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190480</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for irregular Cenvat credit on MS items during the extended period and for MS items during the normal period. Penalties were also revoked due to the appellant&#039;s good faith actions. However, the demand for credit on prefabricated building parts was upheld. The appeal was partially allowed, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>