<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1111 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190482</link>
    <description>The Government upheld the rejection of the rebate claims, emphasizing that allowing the rebate would result in a double benefit as the applicant failed to prove that only the Customs portion of the drawback was claimed. The judgment highlighted the inadmissibility of double benefits under the rebate and duty drawback schemes, citing statutory provisions and legal precedents. The Revision Applications were dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 07:00:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1111 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190482</link>
      <description>The Government upheld the rejection of the rebate claims, emphasizing that allowing the rebate would result in a double benefit as the applicant failed to prove that only the Customs portion of the drawback was claimed. The judgment highlighted the inadmissibility of double benefits under the rebate and duty drawback schemes, citing statutory provisions and legal precedents. The Revision Applications were dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>