<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 704 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339004</link>
    <description>Detained goods were directed to be released on payment of one-time tax where the assessee offered payment without prejudice to its rights. The detention had arisen from absence of an advance inward way bill, non-reporting at the checkpost, and delivery to an address different from the consignee address, while the petitioner maintained that the transaction was an inter-State sale on which tax had already been paid and that there was no evasion warranting the invoked provision. Release was ordered on the stated payment, and the petitioner&#039;s right to challenge the tax and compounding penalty in appropriate proceedings was preserved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 06:43:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 704 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339004</link>
      <description>Detained goods were directed to be released on payment of one-time tax where the assessee offered payment without prejudice to its rights. The detention had arisen from absence of an advance inward way bill, non-reporting at the checkpost, and delivery to an address different from the consignee address, while the petitioner maintained that the transaction was an inter-State sale on which tax had already been paid and that there was no evasion warranting the invoked provision. Release was ordered on the stated payment, and the petitioner&#039;s right to challenge the tax and compounding penalty in appropriate proceedings was preserved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>