<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (2) TMI 5 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6807</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of income exemption post Lady Kikabhai&#039;s relinquishment, holding that the income accrued to the trustees from the trust properties after 1955 was exempt under section 4(3)(i) of the Indian Income-tax Act. The Commissioner was directed to pay the costs of the respondent, settling the matter in favor of the trustees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (2) TMI 5 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6807</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of income exemption post Lady Kikabhai&#039;s relinquishment, holding that the income accrued to the trustees from the trust properties after 1955 was exempt under section 4(3)(i) of the Indian Income-tax Act. The Commissioner was directed to pay the costs of the respondent, settling the matter in favor of the trustees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>