<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1258 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190459</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding inadmissible credit on capital goods imported under the DEPB Scheme. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, stating that the show cause notice was issued beyond the limitation period, with no suppression of facts found. The Court agreed that no substantial question of law arose, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s findings and dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:08:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1258 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190459</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding inadmissible credit on capital goods imported under the DEPB Scheme. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, stating that the show cause notice was issued beyond the limitation period, with no suppression of facts found. The Court agreed that no substantial question of law arose, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s findings and dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>