<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 693 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338993</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to non-service of the impugned order and allowed the appeal regarding setting off carried forward business loss against capital gain under Section 50 of the Income Tax Act. The decision was supported by legal interpretations and precedents favoring the assessee&#039;s claim for the set-off.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 693 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338993</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to non-service of the impugned order and allowed the appeal regarding setting off carried forward business loss against capital gain under Section 50 of the Income Tax Act. The decision was supported by legal interpretations and precedents favoring the assessee&#039;s claim for the set-off.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>