<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 683 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338983</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the appeal in part, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the illegal reference to the DVO before rejecting the account books under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act. However, the Court sided with the department in the deletion of the addition towards extra profit under Section 145(3) of the Act, remanding the matter to the CIT for reconsideration within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 683 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338983</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the appeal in part, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the illegal reference to the DVO before rejecting the account books under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act. However, the Court sided with the department in the deletion of the addition towards extra profit under Section 145(3) of the Act, remanding the matter to the CIT for reconsideration within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>