<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Clarifies Interpretation of &quot;Unless&quot; in Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act for Taxpayer Disclosures in Returns.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33321</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - use of the term &quot;unless&quot; - disclosures made by the offering incomes in the returns u/s 153A - the aforesaid expression “to be furnished” has to be interpreted as “required to be furnished”. Only in that case the Section will make a meaning otherwise the Section does not make any meaning - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:15:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:17:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Clarifies Interpretation of &quot;Unless&quot; in Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act for Taxpayer Disclosures in Returns.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33321</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - use of the term &quot;unless&quot; - disclosures made by the offering incomes in the returns u/s 153A - the aforesaid expression “to be furnished” has to be interpreted as “required to be furnished”. Only in that case the Section will make a meaning otherwise the Section does not make any meaning - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:15:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>