<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Section 80A Inapplicable for Taxpayer&#039;s Deduction Claim u/s 80IB(7)(a) of Income Tax Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33320</link>
    <description>Deduction u/s 80IB(7) - While claiming deduction u/s 80 IB(7) in the return, sub-clause mentioned was (a) and not (b) - Sub-clause (a) talks of a larger degree of deduction and if that was not admissible a smaller degree of deduction, under same section but in another sub-clause could have been allowed - Section 80A has no application - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:15:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:15:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Section 80A Inapplicable for Taxpayer&#039;s Deduction Claim u/s 80IB(7)(a) of Income Tax Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33320</link>
      <description>Deduction u/s 80IB(7) - While claiming deduction u/s 80 IB(7) in the return, sub-clause mentioned was (a) and not (b) - Sub-clause (a) talks of a larger degree of deduction and if that was not admissible a smaller degree of deduction, under same section but in another sub-clause could have been allowed - Section 80A has no application - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:15:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>