<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 678 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338978</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) based on the assessee&#039;s compliance with Explanation 5 conditions. The court also affirmed that disclosures made under Section 153A were considered an extension of disclosures under Section 132(4) as per legal interpretations provided in relevant judgments. The application and appeal were dismissed, as no substantial question of law was found to be involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2017 13:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 678 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338978</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) based on the assessee&#039;s compliance with Explanation 5 conditions. The court also affirmed that disclosures made under Section 153A were considered an extension of disclosures under Section 132(4) as per legal interpretations provided in relevant judgments. The application and appeal were dismissed, as no substantial question of law was found to be involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>