https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338971 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, emphasizing compliance with duty liabilities, proper documentation for Cenvat credit, and adherence to procedural and substantive requirements for duty exemptions and job work arrangements. The appellants' arguments for exemption from Central Excise duty and classification of assembly process as manufacturing were not accepted. The denial of Cenvat credit on inputs was clarified to be based on duty demand for supplied goods, with the possibility of credit if proper documentation is provided. Confiscation of goods, redemption fine, and penalties were upheld but with reduced amounts due to excessive penalties imposed on the appellants. en-us Mon, 02 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jan 2018 14:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338971 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, emphasizing compliance with duty liabilities, proper documentation for Cenvat credit, and adherence to procedural and substantive requirements for duty exemptions and job work arrangements. The appellants' arguments for exemption from Central Excise duty and classification of assembly process as manufacturing were not accepted. The denial of Cenvat credit on inputs was clarified to be based on duty demand for supplied goods, with the possibility of credit if proper documentation is provided. Confiscation of goods, redemption fine, and penalties were upheld but with reduced amounts due to excessive penalties imposed on the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 02 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338971