<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 657 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338957</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed all appeals, stating that no relief could be granted to the appellants. The case was remitted to the Tribunal to dispose of the Company Petition on merit after hearing the petition uninfluenced by the observations made in the impugned orders. The Tribunal was directed to decide the question of maintainability and waiver before deciding the case on merit. If the Tribunal found in favor of the appellants on these preliminary issues, it could pass appropriate orders restoring the original position of the 11th respondent. The appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:59:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 657 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338957</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed all appeals, stating that no relief could be granted to the appellants. The case was remitted to the Tribunal to dispose of the Company Petition on merit after hearing the petition uninfluenced by the observations made in the impugned orders. The Tribunal was directed to decide the question of maintainability and waiver before deciding the case on merit. If the Tribunal found in favor of the appellants on these preliminary issues, it could pass appropriate orders restoring the original position of the 11th respondent. The appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>