<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1231 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190443</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance under section 14A r.w. rule 8D, finding the disallowance of expenses unjustified and deleting it. However, it upheld the disallowance of the provision for insurance settlement. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding non-deduction of tax on export commission payments under section 40(a)(i), modifying the disallowance amount to Rs. 40,07,215.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:55:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1231 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190443</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance under section 14A r.w. rule 8D, finding the disallowance of expenses unjustified and deleting it. However, it upheld the disallowance of the provision for insurance settlement. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding non-deduction of tax on export commission payments under section 40(a)(i), modifying the disallowance amount to Rs. 40,07,215.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>