<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1527 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190444</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds. The judgment emphasized the importance of substantiating claims, complying with legal provisions, and providing satisfactory explanations for financial transactions to avoid disallowances under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:55:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1527 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190444</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds. The judgment emphasized the importance of substantiating claims, complying with legal provisions, and providing satisfactory explanations for financial transactions to avoid disallowances under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>