<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 449 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190441</link>
    <description>Section 47 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 makes a company and the persons in charge of its business liable for offences committed by the company, and also extends liability to directors and officers where consent, connivance or neglect is shown. A complaint need not fail merely because the industrial unit was described instead of the owning company if the pleading as a whole discloses the company&#039;s ownership and control, the alleged breach of sections 25 and 26, and the role of the officers involved. The defect was treated as technical and curable by amendment, so quashing was not justified and the prosecution was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:35:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 449 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190441</link>
      <description>Section 47 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 makes a company and the persons in charge of its business liable for offences committed by the company, and also extends liability to directors and officers where consent, connivance or neglect is shown. A complaint need not fail merely because the industrial unit was described instead of the owning company if the pleading as a whole discloses the company&#039;s ownership and control, the alleged breach of sections 25 and 26, and the role of the officers involved. The defect was treated as technical and curable by amendment, so quashing was not justified and the prosecution was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>