<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1135 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190426</link>
    <description>The CESTAT&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act was overturned by the Apex Court, clarifying that the penalty is mandatory regardless of when the duty was paid. The case was remanded for fresh consideration in light of this interpretation. The judgment did not extensively address the interest levied under Section 11AB, indicating it was not the primary focus of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:44:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1135 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190426</link>
      <description>The CESTAT&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act was overturned by the Apex Court, clarifying that the penalty is mandatory regardless of when the duty was paid. The case was remanded for fresh consideration in light of this interpretation. The judgment did not extensively address the interest levied under Section 11AB, indicating it was not the primary focus of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>