<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 651 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338951</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty levy under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07. The appeal against the penalty order was dismissed, confirming the calculation of understated income based on average GP rates and declared GP rates. The Tribunal affirmed the order of the Ld. CIT(A) regarding additions made to the appellant&#039;s income, disallowance of expenses, and unaccounted sales, leading to the penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 08:32:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 651 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338951</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty levy under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07. The appeal against the penalty order was dismissed, confirming the calculation of understated income based on average GP rates and declared GP rates. The Tribunal affirmed the order of the Ld. CIT(A) regarding additions made to the appellant&#039;s income, disallowance of expenses, and unaccounted sales, leading to the penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>