<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 650 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338950</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing adjustment for advertisement, marketing and sales promotion expenses was unsustainable because the Revenue had not established an international transaction with an identifiable price, and bright line reasoning could not create one. The notional interest adjustment on delayed receivables was also deleted because the main international transactions had already been benchmarked under TNMM, leaving no separate sustainable basis for an independent arm&#039;s length adjustment. Deduction under section 10A was allowed for unit II because the record supported its export-oriented data processing and IT-enabled services activity, and the contrary business characterization did not displace the factual finding of eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 650 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338950</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing adjustment for advertisement, marketing and sales promotion expenses was unsustainable because the Revenue had not established an international transaction with an identifiable price, and bright line reasoning could not create one. The notional interest adjustment on delayed receivables was also deleted because the main international transactions had already been benchmarked under TNMM, leaving no separate sustainable basis for an independent arm&#039;s length adjustment. Deduction under section 10A was allowed for unit II because the record supported its export-oriented data processing and IT-enabled services activity, and the contrary business characterization did not displace the factual finding of eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>