<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (9) TMI 8 - MYSORE High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6791</link>
    <description>Self-acquired property of a Hindu Mitakshara coparcener can be blended with joint family property by conduct showing an intention to abandon separate ownership and throw it into the common hotchpotch; an express declaration is not necessary. On the facts described, the prior division and the recitals in the 1957 deed indicated that the properties had already been impressed with the character of joint family property and were being divided in accordance with Hindu law. Accordingly, the partition under that deed was treated as a division of joint family property, not a transfer by way of gift, and was therefore not chargeable to tax under the Gift-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (9) TMI 8 - MYSORE High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6791</link>
      <description>Self-acquired property of a Hindu Mitakshara coparcener can be blended with joint family property by conduct showing an intention to abandon separate ownership and throw it into the common hotchpotch; an express declaration is not necessary. On the facts described, the prior division and the recitals in the 1957 deed indicated that the properties had already been impressed with the character of joint family property and were being divided in accordance with Hindu law. Accordingly, the partition under that deed was treated as a division of joint family property, not a transfer by way of gift, and was therefore not chargeable to tax under the Gift-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>