<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 626 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338926</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of Rs. 1,05,70,443/- on administrative and other overheads, finding that the business activities had commenced with land acquisition. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, noting the assessee&#039;s compliance with accounting standards. Regarding the disallowance under Section 14A, the Tribunal set aside the issue for the AO to re-determine the disallowance, criticizing the AO for not providing sufficient reasoning and failing to consider the assessee&#039;s accounts. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 08:31:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 626 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338926</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of Rs. 1,05,70,443/- on administrative and other overheads, finding that the business activities had commenced with land acquisition. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, noting the assessee&#039;s compliance with accounting standards. Regarding the disallowance under Section 14A, the Tribunal set aside the issue for the AO to re-determine the disallowance, criticizing the AO for not providing sufficient reasoning and failing to consider the assessee&#039;s accounts. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>