<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 614 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338914</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant should pay interest until the pre-deposit date and could claim the benefit of the penalty discharge. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief as per law, based on the appellant&#039;s compliance with the Tribunal&#039;s order and legal principles established in previous cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 08:30:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 614 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338914</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant should pay interest until the pre-deposit date and could claim the benefit of the penalty discharge. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief as per law, based on the appellant&#039;s compliance with the Tribunal&#039;s order and legal principles established in previous cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>