<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 610 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338910</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s cryptic order on availment of Cenvat credit on fuel used in manufacturing exempted goods could not be sustained because it did not show whether the correct Supreme Court authority had been applied or whether the competing legal positions were properly examined. In the absence of clear reasoning, the controversy could not be finally resolved on the material then before the court. The Tribunal&#039;s order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication on merits and in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 610 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338910</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s cryptic order on availment of Cenvat credit on fuel used in manufacturing exempted goods could not be sustained because it did not show whether the correct Supreme Court authority had been applied or whether the competing legal positions were properly examined. In the absence of clear reasoning, the controversy could not be finally resolved on the material then before the court. The Tribunal&#039;s order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication on merits and in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>