https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338906 Detained goods were directed to be released on deposit of the tax demanded, where the detention had arisen from alleged absence of transport documents and invocation of VAT inspection and compounding provisions. The petitioner maintained that the movement was by branch transfer and not tax evasion, and offered to deposit the tax amount to secure release. The Court accepted release on payment of the tax shown in the impugned order, while preserving the petitioner's right to challenge the tax and compounding fee through the statutory remedy under the Act. en-us Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Feb 2017 08:29:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338906 Detained goods were directed to be released on deposit of the tax demanded, where the detention had arisen from alleged absence of transport documents and invocation of VAT inspection and compounding provisions. The petitioner maintained that the movement was by branch transfer and not tax evasion, and offered to deposit the tax amount to secure release. The Court accepted release on payment of the tax shown in the impugned order, while preserving the petitioner's right to challenge the tax and compounding fee through the statutory remedy under the Act. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338906