https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338905 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was considered in light of the allegations, the applicant's role as a tax consultant, and the material then available. The Court noted that he had provided professional assistance in obtaining registration numbers, but there was no material showing personal gain from the alleged false registrations. His cooperation with the investigating agency was also taken into account. On that factual basis, the Court found the discretionary relief under Section 438 justified and granted anticipatory bail. en-us Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338905 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was considered in light of the allegations, the applicant's role as a tax consultant, and the material then available. The Court noted that he had provided professional assistance in obtaining registration numbers, but there was no material showing personal gain from the alleged false registrations. His cooperation with the investigating agency was also taken into account. On that factual basis, the Court found the discretionary relief under Section 438 justified and granted anticipatory bail. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338905