https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190422 The court determined that the engine in question, despite being affixed to the earth, does not qualify as immovable property due to its nature and purpose. The judgment emphasized that the attachment and sale procedures were appropriate as the engine was classified as movable property. The appeal was allowed, and the suit was dismissed, with each party directed to bear its own costs. en-us Tue, 26 Sep 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:50:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190422 The court determined that the engine in question, despite being affixed to the earth, does not qualify as immovable property due to its nature and purpose. The judgment emphasized that the attachment and sale procedures were appropriate as the engine was classified as movable property. The appeal was allowed, and the suit was dismissed, with each party directed to bear its own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Sep 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190422