https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190417 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of electric bulbs, in a dispute over the denial of Cenvat credit on inputs not physically received at their manufacturing unit in Bhind. Despite the shipping address discrepancy, the tribunal found that the inputs were indeed received and utilized at the Bhind unit, supported by the Chartered Engineer's certification and internal records. The tribunal deemed the denial of credit unsustainable, setting aside the order and allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant. en-us Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:43:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190417 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of electric bulbs, in a dispute over the denial of Cenvat credit on inputs not physically received at their manufacturing unit in Bhind. Despite the shipping address discrepancy, the tribunal found that the inputs were indeed received and utilized at the Bhind unit, supported by the Chartered Engineer's certification and internal records. The tribunal deemed the denial of credit unsustainable, setting aside the order and allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190417