<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1852 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190410</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order that set aside the penalty under Section 11AC and the confiscation of goods. The Tribunal found no evidence of suppression of facts or intent to evade duty by the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2017 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1852 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190410</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order that set aside the penalty under Section 11AC and the confiscation of goods. The Tribunal found no evidence of suppression of facts or intent to evade duty by the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>